You may have seen reports that the federal government is proposing new mortgage finance rules under which only home purchasers who can afford a minimum 20% down payment on a conventional loan would get a shot at the best interest rates and terms. It's true and here are the new guidelines:
Strict mandatory debt-to-income limits. Under the proposal, to get the best mortgage rates, you
would need to spend no more than 28% of your gross monthly income on housing-related expenses, and you couldn't have a total monthly household debt that exceeds 36% of your income. There would be no flexibility to go beyond these ceilings, unlike in today's marketplace in which Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac consider debt-to-income ratios along with other factors through their electronic underwriting systems. At the moment, Freddie Mac has an overall debt ratio limit of 45% of an applicant's stable monthly income.
To refinance your existing mortgage and replace it with one carrying the best interest rate, you'd need no less than a 25% equity stake in your house to qualify. If you sought to take any additional cash through a refinance, you would need 30% equity. Today's requirements are usually not as strict.
Pristine credit standards. For example, if you were 60 days late on any credit account during the previous 24 months, you would be ineligible for a mortgage at the best terms.
These proposals were released at the end of March by banking, securities, and housing regulators, along with the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The agencies were required by the 2010 financial reform legislation to come up with new standards for low-risk conventional mortgages. Under the law, loans that do not meet these strict tests will be pushed into a less-favored, higher-cost category. Banks would need to set aside 5% of loan balances in reserves to cover possible losses from defaults. This extra capital cost would inevitably be passed on to consumers.
